From Golden Visas to Smarter Residency
For more than a decade, Golden Visas defined the playbook for globally mobile capital: invest a set amount – often in real estate – and unlock residency rights, sometimes with a pathway to citizenship. These programs typically accepted qualifying investments in property, capital transfers, businesses, cultural projects, research, or job creation, but real estate quickly became the dominant route because it felt tangible, familiar, and easy to market.
Over time, that same real estate dependency turned into a structural weakness. Property-heavy schemes drove up demand in already-tight housing markets, made locals increasingly vocal about affordability, and pulled Golden Visas onto the front pages of political debates. As a result, what once looked like a straightforward mobility tool has become, in many jurisdictions, an expensive, politically exposed, and operationally unpredictable strategy.
Why the Golden Visa Model Is Losing Its Shine
The appeal of Golden Visas has not vanished, but its centre of gravity has shifted. The combination of rising thresholds, unpredictable policy changes, and mounting political scrutiny has made many property-driven programs feel more like speculative risk than strategic diversification.
Three pressure points define this shift:
- Higher capital commitments
In many markets, minimum investment thresholds have climbed well beyond the comfort zone of globally mobile professionals or mid-tier investors. Governments facing criticism for selling residency have responded by raising price tags, tightening eligibility, or adding layers of compliance that make the process slower and more burdensome. For families who want optionality rather than a lifestyle transformation, the capital outlay now frequently feels disproportionate to the benefit. - Uncertain timelines and stop–go policymaking
Where Golden Visas once projected “buy now, process in months,” timelines have stretched and become harder to predict. Reviews, freezes, suspensions, and redesigns have become recurring features in several jurisdictions. Applicants increasingly report that what used to be a linear process has turned into a moving target, with the risk of being “caught mid-process” – approved in principle under one framework, only to see rules amended before completion – no longer a hypothetical but a lived reality. - Public scrutiny and regulatory fatigue
International institutions and regional bodies in Europe have raised concerns about passive-investment pathways, money-laundering risk, and the optics of “selling” residency or citizenship. National governments, facing housing shortages and cost-of-living pressures, have found it politically easier to constrain or replace property-linked programs than to defend them. Families sense the fatigue: programs that once felt like a stable, 10–15 year bet now look like three-to-five year opportunities that can close or tighten with limited notice.
Put simply, the original Golden Visa formula – “buy property, get residency” – no longer aligns with the risk appetite and planning horizon of many globally mobile families.
The Quiet Pivot: Smarter, Innovation-Led Residency Programs
While first-generation Golden Visas captured headlines, a quieter revolution has been re-shaping the residency landscape. Across Europe and other advanced markets, policymakers are increasingly pivoting from real estate-heavy schemes toward innovation-led, business-focused, and talent-oriented frameworks. These new programs are designed not to inflate property prices, but to:
- attract entrepreneurs and founders
- channel capital into startups and R&D
- support job creation and ecosystem building
- strengthen universities and research institutions
Countries like Portugal, Spain, and France have all moved in this direction in different ways, emphasizing tech entrepreneurship, research collaboration, and business formation instead of pure property acquisition. The result is a new generation of “smarter residency” options that look and behave very differently from the classic Golden Visa template.
What Makes These New Pathways So Attractive?
For CEOs, investors, and wealth managers, the emerging residency models are compelling because they align with how sophisticated families already think about capital: flexible, diversified, and focused on long-term value rather than short-term optics. Several design features stand out.
No Real Estate Requirement – Less Friction, More Flexibility
By delinking residency from property acquisition, these pathways remove the single biggest driver of cost, bureaucracy, and political risk. Instead of being forced into a real estate purchase, applicants can qualify through:
- business creation or participation in a qualifying company
- investment into innovation-focused projects or funds
- structured research collaborations with universities or labs
- entrepreneurship and startup support channels, often with incubator or accelerator backing
This flexibility matters. Families no longer need to park hundreds of thousands of euros in a market they don’t fully understand, in a city they might rarely use, and in an asset that can be hard to exit on reasonable terms. They can direct capital toward vehicles that fit their broader investment thesis and risk tolerance.
Lower Costs and Shorter Timelines
Innovation or business-based residency programs often start at investment or commitment levels that are a fraction of traditional Golden Visa thresholds. Rather than six- or seven-figure property plays, applicants may qualify by:
- funding a lean startup or joining an approved venture
- committing to a structured business plan and meeting job-creation or turnover milestones
- co-investing in innovation funds tied to national R&D priorities
Processing frameworks tend to be explicitly fast-track, with many applicants seeing a clear route to residency in roughly six to eight months, assuming clean documentation and a coherent business or innovation case. This speed is not a perk; it is part of the design, meant to reflect the reality of modern mobility, where executives cannot afford multi-year delays or procedural ambiguity.
Built for Political and Policy Stability
Real estate-heavy programs are easy political targets, especially when housing affordability becomes a headline issue. Innovation-based programs, by contrast, are easier to defend because they:
- create or preserve jobs
- expand the tax base through active business activity
- foster university–industry collaboration
- contribute to national innovation and competitiveness agendas
When a residency framework can be framed as a tool for economic growth, research excellence, and ecosystem building, it is more likely to survive political cycles and public debates. For families, that structural alignment translates into lower policy risk over the long term.
Integration, Not Just Access: Connecting to Local Ecosystems
One of the most significant shifts from Golden Visas to smarter residency programs is philosophical. Golden Visas often granted a legal right – to reside, to travel, to apply later for citizenship – without demanding or enabling deeper integration into the host country. Residency could remain largely theoretical: a card in the wallet rather than an anchor in daily life.
The new generation of programs reverses this logic. From day one, they are built to connect residents into:
- innovation ecosystems and tech hubs
- university networks and research centres
- local entrepreneurial communities and support infrastructure
- co-working, incubation, and venture networks
For founders, investors, and senior executives, this integration is a feature, not a burden. It turns a residency decision into both a mobility solution and an opportunity pipeline, opening doors to deal flow, partnerships, and on-the-ground visibility in key markets.
Freedom of Movement in an Unstable World
Political and regulatory cycles are shortening, and visa rules can shift faster than ever. For globally active families, one of the core benefits of securing residency in the European Union or Schengen-aligned jurisdictions remains unchanged: the ability to move, live, and travel with minimal friction across multiple countries.
Smarter residency programs preserve this benefit but do so through frameworks that are less likely to be abruptly withdrawn. For example, an innovation-led or talent-based residence status tied to a real business or research role is easier to justify than a purely passive holding in a vacant apartment. In a world of sanctions, travel bans, and shifting alliances, the value of robust, multi-country mobility has never been higher – and families are increasingly unwilling to anchor that mobility to politically volatile property markets.
Multi-Generational Planning: Residency as a Long-Term Asset
A notable shift in client behaviour is the re-framing of residency from a transactional product into a multi-generational asset. Rather than asking “How do we get a visa quickly?”, the leading question has become “What structure best protects our children’s options over 20 to 30 years?”.
Smart residency strategies now routinely consider:
- access to public and private healthcare systems across Europe
- educational pathways, from primary schooling to elite universities
- the ability for children and grandchildren to study, work, or found companies in multiple jurisdictions
- cross-border inheritance, tax, and estate planning implications
Data from advisory firms and mobility platforms increasingly shows that the family-first use case is overtaking pure investment motives. Parents and grandparents are willing to allocate capital, time, and strategic focus to residency frameworks that give younger generations durable advantages – especially in education, career optionality, and access to stable legal systems.
Reduced Financial Exposure and Better Capital Allocation
The decline of the real estate-dominated era has also changed how families think about risk. Tying a significant portion of wealth to a single property in a single city in a single country – often at a premium entry price – is no longer seen as the default approach. Instead, many now prefer to:
- limit exposure to illiquid residential markets that may be overvalued
- prioritize diversified, professionally managed vehicles or operating businesses
- ensure that residency-linked investments align with their broader portfolio strategy
Innovation and entrepreneurship-focused residency programs fit naturally into this mindset. They allow families to treat the residency component as part of their allocation to venture, private equity, or mission-driven capital rather than a standalone, emotionally-driven property purchase. The result is a cleaner, more coherent risk profile over time.
A New Era of Residency Strategy
Golden Visas are not disappearing entirely, but the market is clearly signalling a pivot. The programs best positioned to endure – and to attract sophisticated capital – are those that are:
- cost-efficient rather than inflated by speculative property cycles
- politically stable because they deliver visible, measurable value
- rooted in innovation, entrepreneurship, and human capital rather than passive ownership
The mindset is changing too. People no longer want to simply “buy” a visa; they want a framework that:
- integrates them meaningfully into a country’s economy and ecosystem
- protects their family through legal, educational, and healthcare access
- preserves freedom of movement without tying them irreversibly to a volatile asset class
For CEOs, investors, and wealth managers advising global families, the implication is clear: residency can no longer be treated as a box-ticking exercise on a real estate term sheet. It belongs alongside strategic asset allocation, risk management, and multi-generational planning as a core element of long-term positioning.
As 2026 approaches, the smartest strategies will belong to those who move early – before the best innovation and business pathways attract crowding, higher thresholds, and more competitive selection. The world of residency is expanding, and the next decade will be defined by programs that deliver genuine economic contribution, ecosystem access, and structural resilience.
From Golden Visas to Smarter Residency (Key Dimensions)
| Dimension / Insight | Traditional Golden Visas (Property-Led) | Smarter Residency Programs (Innovation / Business / Talent) |
|---|---|---|
| Core investment model | Primarily real estate purchases as qualifying investment | Business creation, innovation funding, R&D collaboration, or entrepreneurship participation |
| Primary value proposition | Buy property and secure residency rights | Contribute to economic value creation and gain residency with ecosystem access |
| Typical capital threshold | Often high six- or seven-figure property purchases | Frequently lower, with leaner business, innovation, or talent-based criteria |
| Asset type | Illiquid residential or commercial real estate | Operating businesses, startups, research partnerships, or human capital |
| Exposure to housing policy risk | High, due to direct link with property markets and affordability debates | Low to moderate, as focus is on innovation, jobs, and economic impact |
| Political perception | Increasingly sensitive and framed as “selling residency” | Easier to defend as growth, innovation, and competitiveness policy |
| Regulatory trend | Tightening, freezes, redesigns, and in some cases closures | Expansion, refinement, and prioritisation within national strategy |
| Timeline predictability | Declining, with more reviews and mid-process changes | Designed to be fast-track and more linear for qualified applicants |
| Processing speed (indicative) | Often slowed by political reviews and property checks | Frequently targeted at roughly 6–8 months for compliant cases |
| Dependence on real estate | Structural; property purchase is central | None or optional; real estate is no longer the defining requirement |
| Main beneficiaries historically | Investors seeking asset-backed residency and potential capital gains | Entrepreneurs, founders, innovators, remote executives, and researchers |
| Integration with local economy | Limited; residency often used as a legal formality | High; residents plug into business, tech, and research ecosystems |
| Ecosystem access | Minimal beyond legal status | Direct links to incubators, universities, clusters, and venture networks |
| Sensitivity to market cycles | Highly exposed to real estate booms and corrections | More diversified, linked to broader innovation and business cycles |
| Policy durability | Vulnerable to sudden tightening or shutdowns | More durable when aligned with long-term economic objectives |
| Use case for families | Secondary residence, lifestyle hedge, or optional relocation | Primary tool for education, career, and multi-generational planning |
| Mobility benefits | Residency often tied to Schengen or regional access | Similar mobility, but framed as part of a broader strategic contribution |
| Financial risk profile | Concentrated exposure to a single asset and market | Distributed across business, innovation, or talent-based opportunities |
| Liquidity profile | Constrained; exit timing depends on local real estate cycles | More flexible; investment forms can be structured for staged exits |
| Compliance and documentation | Heavier on property, valuation, and ownership records | Heavier on business plans, innovation criteria, and track record |
| Appeal to mid-tier investors | Declining as thresholds rise and volatility grows | Increasing, due to lower entry points and clearer value proposition |
| Appeal to large family offices | Mixed; useful but politically exposed | Strong, particularly when aligned with venture and impact mandates |
| Role in portfolio strategy | Often treated as a tactical, standalone property bet | Integrated into broader capital allocation and risk diversification |
| Dominant narrative | “Buy a home and get a visa” | “Build value, create impact, and secure strategic residency” |
| Long-term outlook | Gradual contraction and reconfiguration | Structural growth and institutionalisation over the next decade |

